Programming note

Last night I had to choose between American Idol and Pennsylvania primary results. As a result, I missed Brooke White restarting her song. I hate when that happens!

Tonight, I have to choose between the AI results show and Larry King Live. I'm not usually a devoted LKL viewer, but tonight's show pits James Carville against Bill Richardson. Fireworks are bound to fly, thanks to Carville comparing Richardson to Judas a few weeks back when the New Mexico governor endorsed Barack Obama. But even before that, there was no love lost between these two. They go way back, Carville having engineered Bill Clinton's successful 1992 campaign and Richardson having served in Clinton's Cabinet.

Forget WWE ... this is going to be the real smackdown.

Yes!! I can't wait!! :)

Two days to live

Kelly Reynolds has two days to live.

Doctors gave the Bradenton, Fla., resident just nine months when they diagnosed him with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), better known as Lou Gehrig's disease.

That was three and a half years ago.

Reynolds just wasn't ready to go.

He has stretched his time and lived it on his terms -- a pattern he will extend to his death.

Reynolds has asked to be removed from his respirator Friday. He has helped his wife, Michelle, plan his funeral, which is set for Saturday at 1 p.m.

Two days from death, Reynolds isn't sitting around waiting for Friday to come. He's invited friends to his visitation, which he's holding in his Tampa hospital room until Thursday. He's still sneaking hot fudge sundaes in the hospital. He's still living life on his terms.

Kelly Reynolds will die on Friday. But in his 42 short years, the guy sure learned how to live.

Read the article about Kelly Reynolds and his family here.

Pennsylvania wrap-up

It's the morning after, and Hillary Clinton has made her appearance on CNN to reiterate her position that she isn't going anywhere until the nomination is decided, and she can't see the nomination being decided until the issues of Michigan and Florida are resolved.

CNN's Frank Sesno --

SIDEBAR: Speaking of Frank, where has he been? I used to enjoy watching him, but he's been AWOL for a long time. He's a good reporter who always plays it straight. It was good to see him back. END SIDEBAR

-- made the point that while Clinton hammers on the idea that she doesn't want to see 2.3 million Michigan and Florida voters "disenfranchised" by having their delegations penalized at the convention, it's Clinton who would disenfranchise the 14.3 million-plus people who have voted for Obama with her superdelegate argument. In other words, she doesn't want Michiganders and Floridians disenfranchised, but apparently she doesn't mind it if Alabamians, Georgians, Mississippians, South Carolinians, Louisianans and residents of the 23 other state primaries and caucuses Obama has won are.

Once again, another Clinton double standard ... and we're not even getting into the fact that Clinton's name was the only one that appeared on the ballot in Michigan ... kind of like Castro in Cuba. But I guess that's what a Clinton considers a free and fair election.

Two more good points for the road:

• CNN's Roland Martin reminded us that there will only be seven weeks between the end of the Republican convention, which wraps up Sept. 4, and the general election -- the point being that the longer the Democratic candidates fight with each other, the more time John McCain has to define himself before the Democratic nominee, whoever it turns out to be, has a chance to define him. That's more bad news -- read: reality -- that Democrats who have been swimming in the "this-drawn-out-process-has-been-so-good-for-the-party" Kool-Aid continue to ignore.
• And to wrap it up, longtime politico David Gergen made the statement, "There is a thing worse than losing the election," and that's damaging the party beyond repair. If Hillary Clinton manages to wrest the nomination away from Barack Obama, his lead in states won, delegates won and popular vote notwithstanding, the Democratic Party will alienate young voters and black voters in massive proportions, ultimately resulting in the complete collapse of the party itself. This is what pundits mean when they warn about a Phyrric victory: As the saying goes, "Another such victory, and we are undone."

On to Indiana, where a RealClearPolitics poll average showed a virtual dead heat, with Clinton ahead by just 2.2 percent as of April 16 (a week ago), and North Carolina, where the same average as of April 21 (Monday) shows Obama with a healthy 15.5 percent lead.

Obama's PA speech

... And some thoughts on Obama's speech from Evansville, Ind.:

• Obama wasted no time getting out of Pennsylvania. By giving tonight's speech from Indiana, he gave the campaign a new dateline. Moving the center of the campaign's gravity away from the site of Hillary Clinton's victory has the effect of minimizing that victory. Obama made it clear that he may have taken a fall in Pennsylvania, but the bell has rung and he's ready for the next round.
• Although, as I noted in my remarks about Clinton's speech, she did not congratulate him, Obama congratulated Clinton on the campaign in Pennsylvania. The assembled masses began booing at the mention of her name (see section in previous post about how "good" this extended primary is for the Democratic Party), but Obama shook his head and said, "No, no," gently reprimanding them. Obama chose the high road; Clinton, preferring territory that's well traveled, took the low road.
• Obama answered Clinton's argument that she is a better general election candidate because she is winning "big blue states" by referencing the "hundreds of thousands of new voters" his campaign has drawn and registered -- voters, Obama said, who will "lead our party to victory in November." His argument goes like this: If she's the known quantity you can count on, I'm the new guy who can turn purple (and even some red) states blue. Isn't perspective a fascinating thing?
• Also, apparently in response to the whispered argument that he is still a young man and will have another chance to run for president while this is Hillary's only shot, Obama referred to the "fierce urgency of this moment" and "this election is our chance to change" ... "the smallness of our politics."
• Obama framed the argument for change by implying that sending Clinton to the White House would be basically the same as sending John McCain to the White House: Each represents "the same Washington games with the same Washington players."
• Speaking of McCain, Obama sought to rise above the fray with Clinton to frame himself as the presumed Democratic nominee. He spent several minutes discussing and refuting McCain's positions on a host of issues. The war in Iraq was tops on the list, and Obama made clear that it is the one policy area where he and Clinton have discernible differences. By renewing his emphasis on the war, he reminds Democratic voters (and superdelegates) what it would look like to have a candidate against McCain who opposed the war from the start, as opposed to one who voted, like McCain, to authorize it.
• And back to Clinton, Obama noted that "you can't be the champion of working Americans if you take money from lobbyists who drown out their voices." This was, perhaps, the most important tactical statement of the night. As I said before, Clinton needs to raise a lot of money and she needs to raise it fast to stay competitive, and that means PACs, and lots of them. Obama would do well to hammer her on this point. If she's hitting him on outspending her, he should hit her on having to take lobbyist money to keep it close. Her campaign is dehydrating, but he can poison the only well in town.

And then there were the typical gems that come as part and parcel of any Barack Obama speech. Some of my favorites:

• Obama noted voters who were "inspired for the first time, or for the first time in a long time." He's drawing a lot of young voters, and he's drawing a lot of young-at-heart voters back to the fold. The comparisons to John F. Kennedy and a Kennedyesque idealism began in 2004, when Obama gave the keynote address at the Democratic National Convention, and it's been a theme of his campaign since he stood on the steps of the Illinois State Capitol and announced his candidacy for president more than a year ago.
• "It's not about whether the other party will bring change to Washington," Obama said in reference to McCain. "The question is, will we?" This is a direct challenge to Clinton and it reiterates to voters that a vote for Clinton might as well be a vote for McCain, because they are both Washington usual suspects.
• "We can talk about not just how we can win, but why we should." This is another direct challenge to Clinton, who has been reduced to a win-at-all-costs campaign. It's been called the kitchen-sink strategy, the no-holds-barred strategy, and even the "Tonya Harding strategy," but it means the same thing: Even if it ends up being a Phyrric victory, win. And finally:
• "We will regain not just an office, but the trust of the American people." After eight years of George W. Bush, Democrats are desperate to see one of their own back at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. With this quote, Obama reminds Americans that while the presidency is a worthy goal to which they rightly aspire, there is something more sacred, and that is the faith the American people have in their government.

Obama believes as Scarlett did: "Tomorrow is another day."

Hillary's PA speech

Some thoughts on Hillary Clinton's victory speech from Philadelphia:

• Clinton's line, "The tide is turning" was a clear signal to pundits and superdelegates (and fundraisers) alike: She's not going anywhere anytime soon.
• Inexplicably, Clinton used this opportunity to pledge that in her administration, America would "end the war on science" and renew its commitment to research. Federal funding for stem cell research hasn't been one of the top issues of this campaign, so it's unclear why she would take this opportunity to reiterate her position on this. Maybe it's inside baseball for Pennsylvanians and there was some reason for her to bring it up here. But if not, in my opinion, it was unnecessary. But then again, Clinton is a non-starter with people who care about sanctity of life issues; maybe she thought she had nothing to lose by poking them in the eye -- and she's likely right.
• Overall, I thought this was a decent speech. She was strong without being strident; she was determined without being belligerent. She struck the right balance to match the argument she is making to superdelegates behind the scenes.
• One notable absence from her speech: Traditional niceties to her opponent. It's standard fare for the winner to congratulate the loser, a sort of "good game" from one candidate to the other when all the votes have been cast. Clinton left that out. She did talk about Obama, but only in vague terms ("my opponent") and how she was outspent 3 to 1. It's interesting to keep this in mind when you hear Clinton's talking heads -- notably, Paul Begala -- talking about how she doesn't need to drop out because the extended campaign is so good for the party. The rowdy crowd (incidentally, did they have an open bar at that event or something? That crowd was out of control) booed Obama. Keep that in mind the next time you hear this business about how party faithful will kiss and make up after the convention: Don't count on it.
• Pundits note that almost right away, right after Clinton thanked the people of Pennsylvania for delivering the victory, she asked them to deliver something else: money. She told them that the fate of her campaign depended on them and asked them to go to her web site and send money to keep her going. This is an ominous admission from a candidate: She finally seems to have found her message footing, but the money is drying up. She can't compete down the home stretch without more gas in the tank. But will Democrats find campaign gas -- contributions -- just as costly as the gas they're paying dearly for at the pump? We'll find out over the next couple of days. Begala noted on CNN that Clinton's campaign is already reporting that it has raised $500,000 in the few hours since the polls in Pennsylvania have closed.

On a personal note, I'd just like to express my relief that the Pennsylvania leg of this campaign is over, because if I had to hear Hillary Clinton talk about her grandfather who used to work in the lace mills in Scranton one more time, I would have to ... well, let's just say that the People's Elbow comes to mind.

Finally, staffers choreograph these parties very carefully, and they frequently use candidates' entrance and exit music to deliver certain messages to the public. Tonight, Hillary Clinton took the stage to Tom Petty's "Won't Back Down," whose lyrics include these:

Well, I won't back down; no, I won't back down
You can stand me up at the gates of hell
But I won't back down

Hey, Howard: Regarding that aspirin, you might want to stock up. Take two (more) and repeat after me: "It's good for the party. It's good for the party. It's good for the party ..."

On air and on message

It's clear that the Clinton campaign's message in the wake of her win in Pennsylvania is this: "She's winning the states we have to win in November." Longtime Clintonista Terry McAuliffe had to have said it a half a dozen times in his interview with Wolf Blitzer.

Obama supporter U.S. Sen. Bob Casey (D-PA) is also on message: Obama's a first-time national candidate, "he's already demonstrated that he can bring the country together," and Obama's campaign "already has a real strong foundation" to run on in the fall. Casey is also folding in the argument about "free media" and how it balanced Obama's massive media buy in the Keystone State: He's saying that Clinton benefited from sharing a name with the former president, and that free media just reinforced Pennsylvanians' familiarity with the Clinton brand.

That's a weak argument, as far as I'm concerned. It doesn't say much for Pennsylvanians' ability to think for themselves, for one thing, and it discounts completely the tidal wave of interest that Obama's campaign has generated nationwide. To believe Casey's argument, one has to believe that Pennsylvania has been under some sort of media blackout for the past 12 months that has precluded residents there from getting to know Obama.

Paging Dr. Freud ...

For all the talk about the psychological implications of tonight's primary results, I feel like we need to have Sigmund Freud on the pundit desk tonight.

Clinton needed the win -- and the bigger, the better -- to help with the superdelegate argument and with fundraising. Candy Crowley is making the point right now that Clinton's camp is making the argument to superdelegates that Obama's failure to win any of the big blue states (with the exception of Illinois, his home state) indicates a potential fatal flaw in his candidacy: For all the new voters he's brought in, he isn't resonating with traditional, blue collar Democrats in blue states. And that means trouble for Democrats -- not only at the top of the ticket, but downticket, as well -- in the fall.

Thanks to the win tonight, and assuming a healthy enough win percentage to keep the dollars rolling in, we're going to be hearing a lot about that argument in the coming days.

CNN calls PA

Here it is: Just as it was getting interesting, CNN calls Pennsylvania for Hillary Clinton.

It's no surprise, of course, but everyone is waiting for the margin.

PA or AI????

I've had to take a break from politics for the last 10 minutes to watch David Archuleta on American Idol.

Election results ... or American Idol??

Election results ... or American Idol???

I'm so torn!!!!!

David sang "Think of Me" from Phantom of the Opera. I thought it was pretty good ... it didn't even sound like the same song, and for traditionalists like me, that's always tough when the original is so spectacular. But David is awesome!!

OK, back to Pennsylvania.

Hey, Lancaster!

Hey, I just saw on the mapstats that someone is reading this from Lancaster, PA. Tell us all about what you saw today! Did you vote? Was it crowded? Did you see any of the voting problems that we're starting to hear about?

Do tell!!

Polls closed in PA

CNN projects that it's too early to call the race for Clinton at this point, but exit polls seem to indicate that there aren't any surprises in store.

Clinton's top 10 celeb endorsements

... and here are Hillary's top celebs:

10. Eva Longoria Parker: "Desperate" for Hillary to win, she emceed a Texas town hall meeting the day before the Lone Star State primary.

9. The ever-politically active Barbra Streisand, though she's been less visible this time than in the past.

8. Magic Johnson: Followed Oprah's soiree for Obama with a 300-person event at his Beverly Hills home for Clinton.

7. America Ferrera: "Ugly Betty" star co-chairs "Hillblazers," Clinton's youth outreach group.

6. Mario Lavandeira, a/k/a that annoying, omnipresent celebrity blogger Perez Hilton.

5. Natalie Portman

4. Jack Nicholson: Gave his blessing to a funny video montage that used clips of his movies to make the case for Clinton.

3. Ted Danson and Mary Steenburgen. Danson was in the background when Clinton famously swigged beer -- or was it wine? -- on an airplane recently.

2. Sir Elton John: Professed, "I love you, Hillary," at a recent concert that raised $2.5 million for the former first lady.

1. Ellen DeGeneres: Obama has the old guard in Oprah; Clinton has the new school with Ellen, who recently overtook Oprah as the No. 1 talk show host in America.

Obama's top 10 celeb endorsements

As we await poll closures in Pennsylvania (and the presumptive call of the state for Hillary Clinton), as promised, here are the top 10 celebrity endorsements for Barack Obama, courtesy of the Huffington Post:

10. Jennifer Aniston: The former Rachel Karen Green gave $2300 to Obama's campaign.

9. Robert De Niro

8. Chris Rock: Gave $4600 to Obama's campaign.

7. Samuel L. Jackson: Gave $4300 to Obama's campaign.

6. Scarlett Johansson

5. George Clooney

4. Ben Affleck: He and wife Jennifer Garner hosted a Hollywood fundraiser for Obama in March.

3. The "Kennedy women:" Caroline Kennedy Schlossberg, daughter of President John F. Kennedy, and Maria Shriver, his niece, have campaigned for Obama.

2. The curiously named will.i.am, lead singer for the Black Eyed Peas.

1. Who else -- Oprah Winfrey. Obama is the first candidate the talk show maven has endorsed in her 25-year career, and she's made it worth her while; she hosted a $3 million fundraiser (as in, it cost $3 million to put on) for Obama at her California home.

(gasp) Common sense in the Ivy League

I've been watching this story develop over the past week, and I've resisted the temptation to blog about it until now.

Here's the short of it:

An art student at Yale University gave an interview to the student newspaper wherein she admitted "creating" her senior project out of the product of several miscarriages she suffered. The student, Aliza Shvartz, told the student press that she artificially inseminated herself with the help of a certain number of unknown sperm donors and a needleless syringe. She maintained that she then induced miscarriages by consuming herbal treatments specifically meant to cause miscarriages; she then smeared the resulting product (yes, I mean blood and tissue) over sheets of plastic, which she wrapped around a cube. "The cube was to be suspended from the ceiling of the exhibition hall, and videos of her undergoing the alleged self-induced miscarriages were to be projected on the cube and the walls," according to the Associated Press.

Pro-life groups expressed immediate outrage, not just for the blatant disregard for the pregnancies Shvartz allegedly conceived, but also for Shvartz' own mental health. Interestingly, there was no such immediate reaction from pro-choice groups (at least, not that I saw); they waited to hammer the project until Yale officials responded to the criticism with a statement that Shvartz' project was simply a work of "creative fiction" and that her claims to have conceived and aborted multiple fetuses was part of her "performance art." At THAT point, NARAL came out and said that the exhibit was "offensive and insensitive to the women who have suffered the heartbreak of miscarriage."

So Yale disputed the reality of Shvartz' exhibit, and Shvartz shot back that not only was it real, but it was in fact sanctioned by university officials. This ramping-up of rhetoric on Shvartz' part seems to have served only to harden Yale's position; the university upped the ante and is refusing to display her "artwork" until she admits, in writing, that the whole thing is fake.

No word from Shvartz, who was supposed to have been honored at a reception on Friday.

Let's step back for a moment and consider just a couple of the disturbing aspects of this story:

• Let's begin with the idea that the definition of "art," as defined by Yale officials, includes plastic sheeting smeared with blood -- however it is collected -- and suspended from the ceiling. A university official said that the project was "designed to draw attention to the ambiguity surrounding form and function of a woman’s body." Um, riiight. Look, I understand that art is subjective. But shouldn't the university draw the exploration line at the point where someone inflicts bodily harm on themselves or others? If Shvartz wanted to produce this "art," Yale should have encouraged her to do it AFTER she picked up her Ivy League degree. I'm sure there would be plenty of studios that would be happy to host an exhibition for her ... right?
• I found it interesting that NARAL apparently believes that Shvartz' claim to have induced abortions is "offensive and insensitive" only in the abstract. Had she actually done it, NARAL would have been in the position of having to defend her choice to do so. Kind of throws a whole new light on "choice," doesn't it?

Here are some links for more on this story:

• Yale Officials Conclude Student's Shocking Claim of 'Abortion Art' Was 'Creative Fiction'
• Yale Student Insists Abortion Art Project Is Real, Despite University's Claims of 'Creative Fiction'
• Yale to Cancel Controversial 'Abortion Art' Exhibit Unless Student Admits It's Fiction
• Yale Pulls Student's 'Abortion Art' Project From Exhibit Opening
• The Yale Daily News, which originally broke the story

The postal service delivers ... ammonium nitrate

Authorities in South Carolina this weekend busted an 18-year-old they said was intent on attacking his high school in a Columbine-style attack.

The young man was caught when his parents opened a box he had shipped to their home. Curious about its weight, they opened it -- and were stunned to find ammonium nitrate. Their further investigation revealed papers in his room that detailed his plans

Ammonium nitrate, as you probably know, was the operative explosive that Timothy McVeigh used in his 1995 attack on the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City.

Google ammonium nitrate for sale, and the search engine will return "about 95,400 results." Consider that we're talking about a product that accounts for 98 percent of U.S. industrial explosives sales, is readily available and has been used in highly destructive attacks. Now ask yourself this: How was the young man in South Carolina caught?

His parents called the cops.

How's that for homeland security?

One final note: The young man was arrested Saturday, as survivors marked the 13th anniversary of the Oklahoma City bombing and a day before the ninth anniversary of the Columbine massacre.

Pennsylvania showdown ... and celebrity endorsements

It's April 22 ... FINALLY!!

The presidential primaries return today with the big showdown in Pennsylvania. The feeling I have this morning is not unlike what I felt when I learned the writers' strike was over: After weeks of reruns, it's finally showtime again.

Pennsylvanians will be going to the polls all day, so to occupy your time between now and when our anxious anchors begin breathlessly reporting exit polls bathed in six weeks' worth of pent-up adrenaline, I offer you a little game.

Bored with presidential endorsements by all the usual suspects? See if you can list the top 10 celebrity endorsements from this presidential cycle. Feel free to guess in comments ... I'll post the list tonight as results come in.

Candidates laying the smack down

I've always been a big advocate of better voter turnout in America. Nothing irritates me more than hearing someone say that they didn't vote because they didn't have time, it wasn't convenient, they couldn't get around to it, blah blah blah. Voting is a sacred responsibility for Americans, and I've written about it before.

So I don't know whether to cheer or jeer the latest outreach by our presidential candidates to American voters: their taped appearances yesterday on WWE Monday Night Raw.

Yes, Vince McMahon's wrestling kingdom has apparently reached the point that when he beckons the candidates, they will come running. (Or is it that that is what our political system has come to?) In any event, when a race is this tight, the candidates are unwilling to leave any stone unturned.

So when candidates are around, pandering can't be far behind. Pandering is par for the political course, but some candidates just do it better than others. And that was true on Monday night.

Predictably, Hillary Clinton's pandering was the worst disguised, and her performance was downright awful;

Hi. I'm Hillary Clinton. But tonight, in honor of the WWE, you can call me 'Hill-Rod' ...

I've been knocked down, but I've always gotten back up. And I know how to take a hit for the American people ...

And if things get a little tough, I may even have to deliver the 'people's elbow.'

OK, props for referencing the people's elbow, a signature move of The Rock, a/k/a Dwayne Johnson, one of the most popular wrestlers in the history of McMahon's expansive stable. But "Hill-rod?" She deserves the elbow for that. Her parting shot: "When it comes to standing up for the American people, though, I am ready to rumble." Blech.

And I'm not even going to get into discussing that scarf she had around her neck. Talk about your safety hazards.

John McCain, perhaps also predictably, was just plain goofy in his Ric Flair impression:

"Ta be the man, ya have ta beat the man," he growled. "Come November, it'll be game over. And whatcha gonna do when John McCain and all his McCainiacs run wild on ya?"

McCain gets wrestling style points for the growl, the fist pump that accompanied it, the obligatory reference to himself in the third person and the name he created for his fans. But I have to subtract a point for the way he pronounced Obama's name: "BAR-ock Obama." Why?

So that leaves us with Obama. Perhaps because he's younger and more at home (?) with a WWE/RAW-type audience, Obama nailed his appearance, also invoking Johnson's Rock character by adopting his signature line -- and it required only the most minor revision:

"To the special interests who've been setting the agenda in Washington for too long, and to all the forces of division and distraction that have stopped us from making progress for the American people, I've got one question: Do you smell what Barack is cooking?" he said with a grin.

That is awesome. Obama's self-satisfactory smile indicated that he knew it, too ... Self-confidence: Always key in wrestling.

See the candidates' tapes here.

On a final note, wrestling fans are famous for their creative signs, inexpensively produced on flashy neon posterboard and displayed prominently throughout broadcasts. The candidates' message-makers could learn a thing or two about breaking a thought down into two -- or three, four or five -- carefully selected words.

Man, I just spent 30 minutes discussing WWE-RAW on my political blog. I've become more Jim Ross than Gloria Borger.

I'm going to have to go lie down.

Larry King halftime

I've been watching the rerun of Hillary Clinton's appearance tonight on Larry King Live. She was the guest for the show's first half, and it's just wrapped up.

I have to say, she was solid. She was measured and convincing, not strident the way she is on the stump. King actually posed some decent questions, and he pressed her when she didn't answer directly, but overall, her performance was a good one.

I'm not sure why she turns into some other candidate on the stump; maybe she feels that yelling will bridge the presentation gap she has with Barack Obama (note to Hillary: It doesn't). But I bet her campaign staff has been scratching its collective head trying to figure out how to get that Hillary out on the stump.

Hey, Tony Show is a CNN contributor now. That's interesting! He is looking healthier (you'll remember that has been fighting cancer over the past few years). Tony looks like he's had a hair transplant, but other than that, he's looking like himself again. That's good to see.

Honor and voting in the Keystone State

So you've seen the post referencing that Philadelphia Inquirer article about the uncertainty surrounding the role of women in tomorrow's Pennsylvania primary. But aside from the premise of the article, did anything in it strike you as strange?

Need a minute to see it again? Find it here.

How about this:

Before hearing former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright stump for Clinton at Bryn Mawr College, Sophia Papavizas, 18, a freshman from Arlington, Va., said she was feeling "a change of heart." She voted for Obama in her home-state primary in February, but might switch to Clinton.

Um, so, Sophia plans to vote twice during the primary season -- once in Virginia, once in Pennsylvania?

While Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama spar over votes of Michiganders and Floridians being counted once, Sophia's will apparently count -- both times.

It's a logical leap of faith, but I'll make it for the purposes of this question: Let's assume that our friend Sophia met all registration requirements in both the Commonwealth and the Keystone State.

What does that say, then, about the registration requirements in the Commonwealth and the Keystone State?

What does it say about our patchwork primary system in general?

This question percolates every four years in my native state of Florida, where the proliferation of the availability of the absentee ballot enables a significant number of -- ahem, our Northern friends -- to vote in the presidential election in their home states and again in the Sunshine State. But since the state of Florida has a hard time keeping track of foster children, no one really expects elections officials to be able to take on this behemoth.

The honor system ... Who says it's outdated?

Girls' night in PA?

Political experts anticipate that the Democratic women of Pennsylvania will swing tomorrow's long-awaited primary, and conventional wisdom would hold that that would be good news for Hillary Clinton.

But this is no conventional primary (right, Howard Dean?).

In this revealing report from the Philadelphia Inquirer, women talk frankly about why all bets are off in the Keystone State. Two examples: One, a 53-year-old mother with a perfect Republican voting record, will vote for Barack Obama; another, a 19-year-old African American college freshman from West Philadelphia whose five brothers will vote for Barack Obama, will cast her vote for Clinton.

What is driving this uncertainty?

Many women said they found the candidates were more similar than not on issues, leaving their final choices to more subjective assessments of character and leadership ...

Many said that if Clinton were running against a white male, they would feel more compelled to support her as the first woman to run for president. But with Obama as her opponent, they said, their votes will be historic either way they go.

To set the statistical stage, one politico said he expects women to cast 60 percent of tomorrow's votes, up from the usual 56 or 57 percent turnout. But the clearest indication that this race is still up in the air: a staggering 47 percent of women still have not made up their minds.

The degree of vote switching, coupled with the number of undecided voters, is unusually high in this primary and opens up possibilities for both campaigns, said Celinda Lake and Kellyanne Conway, the pollsters who conducted Lifetime Networks' poll of women voters this month.

"This cycle is so different," Conway said. "They're undecided not because they're not paying attention - but because they are paying attention."